The word God is a proof that God exist? (sic)

Not sure if that question on Facebook was supposed to be a question or a statement. I think that it was supposed to be a leading question, as in leading the reader to go along with the false presumption that a god exists because the word “God” exists.

Lots of words exist. That doesn’t mean that the thing represented by the word exists. I’m sure that you and I can come up with many examples, like Unicorn, Horcrux, Fairy, Leprechaun, Mermaid, cyclops, ogre, etc.

It seems that even the author himself was unconvinced by that argument because he went on with:

Isn’t it a scientific failure to have lacked the scientific process to prove God empirically?

(Note: That question was so grammatically confusing as to have made NO SENSE).

Do atheists really believed (sic) in bigbang (sic) as the creator of the sky and the air?

So bigbang (sic) knew that human beings need to breathe and gave them air?

Those who know me know how I love a good debate about the existence of a deity. So far this absolutely HASN’T BEEN ONE, since the OP (original poster) hasn’t made a valid argument for the existence of a god, especially considering that he has NO CLUE as to WHAT Atheists believe and also has little to no understanding of the facts surrounding the “Big Bang” theory, so I thought I’d just clear it up a bit for him:

Atheists believe in the big bang theory but the theory is NOT a…